The area's leading online source for news!
Louisa-Lawrence Co, KY

In God We Trust - Established 2008

Menu

December 14, 2014;

Obama called the Sony hack an act of ‘cyber vandalism.’ He’s right...

It's official: "Why didn't you call it cyber warfare?" is the new "Why didn't you call it terrorism?

Over the weekend, Republicans slammed President Obama for that they called a weak-kneed response to the North Korean hackers who are suspected of targeting Sony in a major data breach. In interviews with CNN and CBS, Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.) called the hacking "a new form of warfare" and "terrorism," respectively, and criticized the White House's characterization of the incident as "cyber vandalism."

All this Washington hand-wringing over verbiage is more or less politically motivated. But the theatrics risk obscuring a key point: Like terrorism, cyber warfare has a specific military definition. Calling the intrusion into Sony's network a definite act of cyber war not only makes it harder for the United States to distinguish between actual national security threats and inflated ones, but it also makes it harder for America to shape crucial international norms about how and when to use cyberweapons — norms that could help ward off the next North Korean hack.
You may know that the Pentagon has an entire glossary of terms when it comes to waging war in cyberspace. This should make total sense. Just like in physical war, linguistic ambiguity and confusion lead to mistakes, and mistakes get people killed. Especially in a field as new as cyber, you don't want to be messing around trying to define your terms when the bombs start to fall.

So how does the Defense Department define cyber warfare?

cyber warfare (CW): Creation of effects in and through cyberspace in support of a combatant commander's military objectives, to ensure friendly forces freedom of action in cyberspace while denying adversaries these same freedoms. Composed of cyber attack (CA), cyber defense (CD), and cyber exploitation (CE).


Note the emphasis on "a combatant commander's military objectives." It might seem obvious that the Pentagon's business is to talk in terms of the military. But this is actually an important signal to the rest of the world that cyber warfare ought to be thought of as a military activity, conducted by military officials, for military purposes.

This is far from a consensus opinion. China, Russia and, yes, North Korea all have sophisticated military hacker units. To the extent Washington can prove it, these hackers' actions show they believe businesses, banks and other civilian institutions to be legitimate targets for cyberspace operations — or, as the Pentagon puts it,

The employment of cyber capabilities where the primary purpose is to achieve military objectives or effects in or through cyberspace.

What's really going on here is a battle to determine whether, in fact, the infiltration of corporate networks, exposure of business information and censorship of U.S. film studios is a legitimate military activity. Some foreign governments would probably like nothing better than for the definition of war to expand this way. But for those who believe civilians should be kept out of war as much as possible, blurring the line between cyber warfare and cyber crime (or espionage) is potentially a very bad thing. It expands the number of scenarios potentially requiring a military response, spreading resources thin. It puts pressure on countries like the United States to engage in reciprocal behavior — or suffer a growing disadvantage.

Obama has repeatedly come under criticism as being too cool in a crisis. Others have come to his defense, arguing that cooler heads make for less interesting headlines but better resolutions. The same pattern appears to be playing out today. And while we'll probably never know for certain, Obama's decision not to use the language of cyber warfare might be the best decision he can make right now.

Date: 12-02-2014;

U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Facebook threats dispute; lyrics posted on Facebook were from the song 'Class Dismissed (A Hate Primer)'



Facebook, the world’s electronic fishbowl, was the subject of arguments Monday before the U.S. Supreme Court about what constitutes a legal threat on the popular social media platform.

Local authorities say the case is important as the law tries to protect people from physical and emotional harassment.

The court’s ruling could come this summer.

Anthony Douglas Elonis, 31, of Lower Saucon Township, Pa., appealed his 44-month prison sentence for postings on Facebook four years ago. He was convicted of a federal law that makes it a crime to “transmit in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another.” He was convicted of five counts.

Elonis put messages on Facebook in the form of rap that threatened his estranged wife and an FBI agent.

“We would take the threat as to how the victim viewed it,” said Capt. Dominic Ossello, public information officer for the Western Kentucky University Police Department. “It would be as if someone would be standing face to face with the victim.” 

He said the university police department has no control over what WKU students post on Facebook or what is posted about the university.

John Elwood, Elonis’ attorney, argued before the high court that the jury that convicted Elonis must not only determine a reasonable person would interpret the messages as a threat, but also that the man intended the words to be a threat. Federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald disagreed with Elonis’ contention that the messages were no more dangerous than explicit rap song lyrics. Fitzgerald said Elonis’ estranged wife perceived the threats as real.

“The degree of difficulty has always been what is the intent” of the person, with the key being “how did the victim take it?” Ossello said. “The court reviews both sides.”

Lawyers for Elonis said his posts in the form of rap lyrics under the pseudonym “Tone Dougie” were simply a way for him to vent his frustration over splitting up with his wife, The Associated Press reported Monday.

“I think he (Elonis) is trying to use his free-speech rights,” said Krisstal Clayton, an assistant psychology professor at WKU. “There are problems with cyberbullying, and people worry about stalking. He was trying to get at her any way that he could.”

The government argued the real test is whether his words would make a reasonable person feel threatened. In one post about his wife, Elonis said, “There’s one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I’m not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts,” the AP reported.

“How does one prove what’s in somebody else’s mind,” said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was on the bench five days after she had a stent implanted to clear a blocked artery, the AP reported.

“As far as threats are concerned, we don’t deem a threat on social media any less serious than a threat in person,” said Officer Ronnie Ward, spokesman for the Bowling Green Police Department. “Most laws are written broad enough to cover electronic and traditional means.”

Ward said harassing communications (Kentucky Revised Statutes 525.080) and harassment in general (KRS 525.070) cover threats made either way.

Justice Antonin Scalia questioned whether Elonis’ comments about causing physical harm in the context of a marital dispute deserve First Amendment protection. He said the government’s standard “doesn’t eliminate a whole lot of speech at all,” the AP reported.

Elwood argued that Elonis had a disclaimer on his Facebook page that his comments were only for entertainment purposes. But Justice Samuel Alito seemed skeptical, the AP reported.

“This sounds like a roadmap for threatening a spouse and getting away with it,” Alito said.

The Obama administration says requiring proof that a speaker intended to be threatening would “undermine the law’s protective purpose,” the AP reported.

Song lyrics, as potential threats on social media, have received protection under the First Amendment, at least in Kentucky.

Last month, charges were dismissed against James E. Evans, 31, of Muhlenberg County, after Evans spent eight days in jail for posting violent song lyrics on his Facebook page, according to AP. Evans had been charged with terroristic threatening. 

The lyrics posted by Evans on Facebook were from the song “Class Dismissed (A Hate Primer)” by California band Exodus. The American Civil Liberties Union said the post was free speech protected by the First Amendment.

First-degree terrorist threatening carries a potential jail term for up to 10 years upon conviction. Evans was arrested and jailed Aug. 26 and released Sept. 3.

The Supreme Court last looked at the question of a person’s intent in 2003, when it reviewed a Virginia law that regarded cross burnings. The court ruled cross burnings could be viewed as criminal intent if the intent to intimidate was proven, according to published reports.

 

By Chuck Mason
Bowling Green Daily News

 

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2014;

Obama wants Internet regulated like utilities; Sen. McConnell says move would stifle innovation

President Barack Obama said on Monday that because the Internet is as important in Americans' lives as electricity and telephone service, it should be "regulated like those utilities to protect consumers," Edward Wyatt writes for The New York Times. Obama said the Federal Communications Commission should make this change to keep broadband companies from slowing down legal content or allowing content providers to pay extra for a fast lane.

This discussion is especially important for rural areas, many of which do not have adequate broadband access to begin with. Also, innovation and start-ups can be particularly beneficial to rural people, so considering whether this change would promote that is important.

Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C.Many see the president's move as support of Tom Wheeler, F.C.C. chairman, who is working on a plan to protect open Internet—called net neutrality. "The debate may hinge on whether Internet access is considered a necessity, like electricity, or more of an often-costly option, like cable TV," Wyatt writes. Netflix, Democrats in Congress and consumer advocacy groups are the move's primary supporters, but leading providers of Internet access, Republicans and some investment groups do not like the idea and say this regulation is too heavy-handed and will hurt online investment and innovation.

Companies that make routers and servers, represented by the Telecommunications Industry Association, said they "strongly urge regulators to refrain from reclassification that will guarantee harm to consumers, the economy and the very technologies we're trying to protect." Senator John Thune of South Dakota said the effort "would turn the Internet into a government-regulated utility and stifle our nation's dynamic and robust Internet sector with rules written nearly 80 years ago for plain old telephone service."

U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell sent a statement in response to Obama's announcement about the regulations. He wrote that the Internet currently allows innovators to create and sell products people like and makes jobs "without waiting around for government permission." The President's decision "to abandon this successful approach in favor of more heavy-handed regulation that will stifle innovation and concentrate more power in the hands of Washington bureaucrats is a terrible idea. The Commission would be wise to reject it." (Read more)

Written by Melissa Landon Posted at 11/11/2014 

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014;

FCC to propose 62 percent increase in money to wire schools; would help connect rural schools...

Federal Communications Commission chairman Tom Wheeler is expected to propose a 62 percent increase in the amount of money the agency spends annually to wire schools and libraries with high-speed Internet connections, Edward Wyatt reports for The New York Times. The move would increase the FCC's annual cap on spending for school Internet from $1.5 billion to $3.9 billion. (NYT photo by Mark Holm: FCC chairman Tom Wheeler)
 

The move would most benefit rural areas, where "seven in 10 rural districts say none of their schools can meet high-speed Internet connectivity targets today," Wyatt writes. "Schools in affluent areas are three times more likely to meet speed targets as those in low-income areas, the FCC says." 

"Libraries need upgrades too, and in low-income and rural areas, they are important because they often provide the only available Internet connection for many people," Wyatt writes. "Yet half of all public libraries report connection speeds of less than 10 megabits per second. Mr. Wheeler has said 25 megabits per second should be considered “table stakes” in 21st-century communications." 

"The new spending would lead to an increase of roughly 16 percent in the monthly fee on consumers’ phone bills," Wyatt writes. "The fee is used to finance the Universal Service Fund, an $8.7 billion effort that provides phone and broadband connections for low-income populations, rural areas, and schools and libraries."

"FCC officials say consumers would pay less than $2 a year in additional fees per phone line, or less than $6 extra per household, on average; currently the average household pays about $36 a year," Wyatt writes. "But the amount an individual household pays can vary widely, with fees assessed on both home and mobile service. Businesses pay into the program as well." (Read more)

Written by Tim Mandell Posted at 11/18/2014


Date: 11-11-2014;

Mobile tech classroom sparks student interest...


Monday morning outside West Kentucky Community and Technical College's Emerging Technology Center, Samsung Mobile set up shop in a 100-foot technology-integrated mobile classroom full of Raspberry Pies.

Brandyn Potavin (left) of Gilbertsville, a visual communications major with information technology background, works on the computer systems provided by the Samsung Mobile U Tour on Monday at West Kentucky Community & Technical College' s Emerging Technology Center in Paducah.A Raspberry Pi (pronounced just like the dessert) is a low-cost, credit-card sized computer that plugs into a monitor or TV and uses a standard keyboard and mouse. Samsung assembled a small fleet of these tiny circuit boards, connected them to a fleet of Samsung Chrome Books, and extended an open invitation for local students to use the devices and learn computation and programming skills. 

WKCTC was Samsung's first stop along its Samsung Mobile U Tour, an initiative designed to target community and technical college students and spark their interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers.

"We do a number of STEM education support programs, but this program really stands for our vision to grow more homegrown engineers," said Cindy Chang, Samsung marketing manager.

"These students who graduate with engineering and technical degrees, they could ultimately become our future employees. It completes this pathway of support," she said.

The mobile classroom was open Monday to all students at every skill level. The program offers three curriculum routes: beginner, intermediate and advanced. Beginners can learn more about the general nature of how computers work, as well as the basic principles of computer programming.

"Coding is something that, if you haven't been introduced to it, can be very intimidating," Chang said. "But it doesn't have to be."

Students who take the intermediate route get to build their own program and modify the source code of existing games built in Python to change how the games work in real time. Python is an increasingly popular computer language used to build applications like Dropbox.

Advanced students are given the opportunity to create a web server on the Raspberry Pi and create and host a website on that server.

The national need for STEM skills is great, and is only expected to grow. Jobs in computer systems design and related industries are expected to grow by 45 percent by 2018, according to the National Math and Science Initiative.

In a 2011 report exploring the economic value of various college majors, Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce found that of their 15 college major categories, engineering led to the highest median earnings. Despite that figure, the study found that less than 20 percent of students choose a STEM path in school. "This is an exciting thing for us to have," said WKCTC President Barbara Veazey of Samsung's mobile classroom. "For our students to see that a bigger job - like a job with Samsung - is a real possibility for them is huge. This is Samsung's first time to highlight the importance of the community college and STEM education as a pathway to a great job."

Veazey explained that WKCTC's Emerging Technology Center was built in hopes of remedying a very real problem - a lack of technically skilled workers.

"It didn't happen overnight," Veazey said. "It was a deliberate recognition of a need and a problem. We tried to address it as a community, and we did."

Both Chang and Veazey said they hope the Samsung Mobile U initiative will spark more student interest in STEM career paths.

"It's just amazing, isn't it?" said Tammy Potter, WKCTC dean of business and computer-related technologies. "Wednesday and Thursday we have almost every time slot filled with CIT (computer information technologies) and engineering students. I know they're really excited about learning to work in Python. For our students to see this type of technology is very exciting, because it gets them out of the classroom and enables them to see something new."

The Samsung Mobile U crew has prearranged class sessions with WKCTC students for Wednesday and Thursday, but said they won't turn anyone away. The mobile classroom, parked in front of the Emerging Technology Center, will be open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Wednesday and Thursday.

 

BY GENEVIEVE POSTLETHWAIT
The Paducah Sun